See exactly what you get

A real sample of each document — risk assessment, RAMS, COSHH assessment and toolbox talk — before you spend anything.

Risk Assessment — Replacing 6 Broken Roof Tiles on Two-Storey Residential Property

RA-2026-0501

Risk Assessment

Replacing 6 Broken Roof Tiles on Two-Storey Residential Property

Replacing 6 broken concrete or clay roof tiles on a 2-storey house

Assessor

Robert

Company

ABC Roofing Co.

Industry

Roofing

Assessment Date

1 May 2026

Review Date

1 May 2027

Reference

RA-2026-0501

1. Introduction & Scope

This assessment covers the replacement of 6 broken concrete or clay roof tiles on a two-storey residential dwelling. The work involves accessing the roof via ladder or scaffold tower, removing damaged tiles, and installing replacement tiles to match existing specification. The property is occupied during works. Location: domestic two-storey terraced or semi-detached house with pitched roof at approximately 6–7 metres ridge height. Workers: 2–5 qualified roofers holding valid CSCS cards; members of the public (householders and neighbours) may be present in adjacent areas. Duration: half working day (approximately 3–4 hours including setup and clearance).

2. Risk Rating Matrix (5×5)

Likelihood (1–5) × Severity (1–5) Low (1–4) Medium (5–14) High (15–25)

L \ S12345
5510152025
448121620
33691215
2246810
112345

3. Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment

  • Hazard 1 : Fall from height during roof access and work on pitched surface HIGH ( 20 ) Who is at risk Roofers at ~6–7 m height Existing controls CSCS cards held; Class 1 ladders inspected before use; safety footwear; ground-level roof condition survey Additional controls required Scaffold tower with double guardrails (950 mm & 470 mm) and toe boards; ladder secured at 1:4 angle, extending 1 m above landing; roof ladders with ridge hooks; exclusion zone with barriers; toolbox talk before work; no work above 25 mph wind, rain, ice or snow Initial: 4 × 5 = 20 HIGH Residual: 2 × 5 = 10 MEDIUM

  • Hazard 2 : Falling objects striking persons below (tiles, tools, debris) HIGH ( 16 ) Who is at risk Householders, neighbours, ground operatives Existing controls Hard hats worn; householder warned verbally; tools in belts; broken tiles placed into rubble sacks Additional controls required Exclusion zone min. 3 m with barriers, cones and hazard tape; 'Danger Overhead Work' signage; debris netting on scaffold; rope-and-bucket system to lower materials — no throwing; dedicated ground operative to police zone; neighbours informed of schedule Initial: 4 × 4 = 16 HIGH Residual: 2 × 4 = 8 MEDIUM

  • Hazard 3 : Manual handling injuries from lifting tiles, scaffold, ladders and equipment MEDIUM ( 9 ) Who is at risk All roofers transporting materials Existing controls Manual handling training completed; tiles carried in small batches; two-person lift for ladders and scaffold; sack trucks available Additional controls required Mechanical hoist or gin wheel to raise tiles; max 3–4 tiles per carry; clear access route maintained; kinetic lifting technique enforced; task rotation to avoid prolonged repetitive lifting Initial: 3 × 3 = 9 MEDIUM Residual: 2 × 3 = 6 MEDIUM

  • Hazard 4 : Slips, trips and falls on ground level (uneven surfaces, cables, equipment) MEDIUM ( 6 ) Who is at risk All workers and householders on site Existing controls Site walkover on arrival; slip-resistant safety footwear; materials stored away from access routes; housekeeping briefing Additional controls required Dedicated storage area for materials and tools; barriers protecting site entrance from public footpath; inspection of access route after each material delivery; good housekeeping enforced throughout the day Initial: 3 × 2 = 6 MEDIUM Residual: 1 × 2 = 2 LOW

  • Hazard 5 : Contact with asbestos-containing materials in older roof structure or cement tiles MEDIUM ( 10 ) Who is at risk All roofers removing or handling tiles Existing controls Asbestos awareness certificates held; visual inspection before work; company register of known ACM properties; work stops immediately if ACM suspected Additional controls required Refurbishment & Demolition survey if property pre-dates 2000; stop-work procedure if fibrous material found; licensed contractor engaged for confirmed ACM removal; full PPE including FFP3 mask if risk present; waste disposed as controlled waste Initial: 2 × 5 = 10 MEDIUM Residual: 1 × 5 = 5 MEDIUM

  • Hazard 6 : Adverse weather — high winds, rain, ice and extreme temperatures MEDIUM ( 12 ) Who is at risk Roofers on exposed pitched surface Existing controls Forecast checked on morning of work; supervisor authority to postpone; appropriate PPE worn; water available in vehicle Additional controls required Detailed forecast checked 24 h before and on morning; stop if wind > 25 mph or gusts > 35 mph; no work on ice, frost or snow; hydration breaks every hour above 25 °C; hi-vis waterproof clothing; gloves in cold/wet; all materials and tools secured against wind displacement Initial: 3 × 4 = 12 MEDIUM Residual: 2 × 4 = 8 MEDIUM

  • Hazard 7 : Contact with overhead electrical cables during ladder placement MEDIUM ( 10 ) Who is at risk Roofers positioning ladders and scaffold towers Existing controls Site survey before equipment positioning; operatives briefed to look up before raising ladders; min. 3 m exclusion zone from visible cables Additional controls required Identify all overhead cables and measure clearance; maintain ≥3 m from ≤33 kV, ≥5 m from > 33 kV; mark exclusion zones on ground; non-conductive fibreglass ladders near cables; contact DNO if clearance cannot be achieved; trained banksman to supervise movements near cables Initial: 2 × 5 = 10 MEDIUM Residual: 1 × 5 = 5 MEDIUM

  • Hazard 8 : Inadequate emergency arrangements — first aid, fire response and rescue from height MEDIUM ( 8 ) Who is at risk All workers and householders Existing controls First aid kit in vehicle; mobile phones carried; nearest hospital location known; fire extinguisher in vehicle; emergency contacts displayed Additional controls required Minimum one operative holds valid EFAW certificate; confirm mobile signal before starting; record exact address and nearest cross-street for emergency services; rescue plan for person injured at height; vehicle access route kept clear; buddy system with 30-minute check-in calls if lone working; all incidents recorded in accident book; RIDDOR reports submitted within required timescales Initial: 2 × 4 = 8 MEDIUM Residual: 1 × 4 = 4 LOW

4. Relevant Legislation

  • — Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
  • — Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999
  • — Work at Height Regulations 2005
  • — Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015
  • — Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
  • — Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012
  • — Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992
  • — Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992
  • — Electricity at Work Regulations 1989
  • — RIDDOR 2013

5. Declaration & Sign-off

This risk assessment has been prepared following the HSE 5-step methodology (INDG163) and is believed to be suitable and sufficient for the described activity. It must be reviewed at the stated review date, or sooner if there is reason to suspect it is no longer valid, there has been a significant change in the work activity or personnel, or an accident, incident or near-miss occurs.

Assessor

Robert

Date

1 May 2026

Review Date

1 May 2027

Signature

_____________________

Download the sample PDF instantly — no sign-up required.

Every sample here was produced by the generator from a job description — no mock-ups.

Download Sample PDF

Create your own bespoke risk assessment

Create your risk assessment

Cookie settings